<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ding ding: John Waters v a Blogger</title>
	<link>http://www.irishtimes.com/blogs/presenttense/2008/01/22/ding-ding-john-waters-v-a-blogger/</link>
	<description>Just another irishtimes.com weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 05:33:11 +0000</pubDate>

	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://www.irishtimes.com/blogs/presenttense/2008/01/22/ding-ding-john-waters-v-a-blogger/#comment-4165</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 23:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.irishtimes.com/blogs/presenttense/2008/01/22/ding-ding-john-waters-v-a-blogger/#comment-4165</guid>
		<description>I loved that John stood up for the value of "common knowledge" or as many people know term it urban legend and prejudice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved that John stood up for the value of &#8220;common knowledge&#8221; or as many people know term it urban legend and prejudice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daragh O Brien</title>
		<link>http://www.irishtimes.com/blogs/presenttense/2008/01/22/ding-ding-john-waters-v-a-blogger/#comment-4154</link>
		<dc:creator>Daragh O Brien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.irishtimes.com/blogs/presenttense/2008/01/22/ding-ding-john-waters-v-a-blogger/#comment-4154</guid>
		<description>I think Fergal acquitted himself quite well against a veteran performer in these types of slugging matches. He should consider a career in some kind of advocacy role. 

I agree the setup wasn't ideal. It was a good debate, but not a great debate and a different format with more participants would make for a more interesting discourse. There were some very good moments though throughout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Fergal acquitted himself quite well against a veteran performer in these types of slugging matches. He should consider a career in some kind of advocacy role. </p>
<p>I agree the setup wasn&#8217;t ideal. It was a good debate, but not a great debate and a different format with more participants would make for a more interesting discourse. There were some very good moments though throughout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twenty Major</title>
		<link>http://www.irishtimes.com/blogs/presenttense/2008/01/22/ding-ding-john-waters-v-a-blogger/#comment-4153</link>
		<dc:creator>Twenty Major</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.irishtimes.com/blogs/presenttense/2008/01/22/ding-ding-john-waters-v-a-blogger/#comment-4153</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;. There’s a good debate to be had on Irish blogging - between a selection of people who know the subject well - but this wasn’t it.&lt;/i&gt;

I agree with that too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>. There’s a good debate to be had on Irish blogging - between a selection of people who know the subject well - but this wasn’t it.</i></p>
<p>I agree with that too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brock Landers</title>
		<link>http://www.irishtimes.com/blogs/presenttense/2008/01/22/ding-ding-john-waters-v-a-blogger/#comment-4152</link>
		<dc:creator>Brock Landers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.irishtimes.com/blogs/presenttense/2008/01/22/ding-ding-john-waters-v-a-blogger/#comment-4152</guid>
		<description>It looked for a glorious few seconds as if Waters was going to be tempted into sticking the boot into yourself, Jim and Conor. Now that would have been magic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looked for a glorious few seconds as if Waters was going to be tempted into sticking the boot into yourself, Jim and Conor. Now that would have been magic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://www.irishtimes.com/blogs/presenttense/2008/01/22/ding-ding-john-waters-v-a-blogger/#comment-4151</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.irishtimes.com/blogs/presenttense/2008/01/22/ding-ding-john-waters-v-a-blogger/#comment-4151</guid>
		<description>Twenty - I agree, although the set up wasn't ideal. There's a good debate to be had on Irish blogging - between a selection of people who know the subject well - but this wasn't it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twenty - I agree, although the set up wasn&#8217;t ideal. There&#8217;s a good debate to be had on Irish blogging - between a selection of people who know the subject well - but this wasn&#8217;t it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twenty Major</title>
		<link>http://www.irishtimes.com/blogs/presenttense/2008/01/22/ding-ding-john-waters-v-a-blogger/#comment-4150</link>
		<dc:creator>Twenty Major</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.irishtimes.com/blogs/presenttense/2008/01/22/ding-ding-john-waters-v-a-blogger/#comment-4150</guid>
		<description>I thought Fergal did a fine job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Fergal did a fine job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://www.irishtimes.com/blogs/presenttense/2008/01/22/ding-ding-john-waters-v-a-blogger/#comment-4148</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.irishtimes.com/blogs/presenttense/2008/01/22/ding-ding-john-waters-v-a-blogger/#comment-4148</guid>
		<description>Twenty - That could have been you throwing the punches this morning.

73man - I'm not the editor yet, but thanks for the compliment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twenty - That could have been you throwing the punches this morning.</p>
<p>73man - I&#8217;m not the editor yet, but thanks for the compliment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 73man</title>
		<link>http://www.irishtimes.com/blogs/presenttense/2008/01/22/ding-ding-john-waters-v-a-blogger/#comment-4147</link>
		<dc:creator>73man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.irishtimes.com/blogs/presenttense/2008/01/22/ding-ding-john-waters-v-a-blogger/#comment-4147</guid>
		<description>Is John the new Kevin Myers? Put there just to provoke reader outrage? Madame Editor?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is John the new Kevin Myers? Put there just to provoke reader outrage? Madame Editor?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twenty Major</title>
		<link>http://www.irishtimes.com/blogs/presenttense/2008/01/22/ding-ding-john-waters-v-a-blogger/#comment-4145</link>
		<dc:creator>Twenty Major</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.irishtimes.com/blogs/presenttense/2008/01/22/ding-ding-john-waters-v-a-blogger/#comment-4145</guid>
		<description>He sounded like a bit of an eejit this morning, it has to be said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He sounded like a bit of an eejit this morning, it has to be said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://www.irishtimes.com/blogs/presenttense/2008/01/22/ding-ding-john-waters-v-a-blogger/#comment-4129</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.irishtimes.com/blogs/presenttense/2008/01/22/ding-ding-john-waters-v-a-blogger/#comment-4129</guid>
		<description>I can see this going down to a points decision with plenty of money on offer for the rematch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see this going down to a points decision with plenty of money on offer for the rematch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
